A blog scoped to Bitcoin Cash — the chain, its upgrades, its ecosystem (CashTokens, DEXes, wallets, merchants), and the site's own reading of what the protocol is for. Posts will appear here as they're written; the space is set up so a reader following BCH specifically has one URL to bookmark.
This space is new. Until the first BCH-scoped post lands, the closest existing reading lives in the site-wide Journal — the four posts below all touch Bitcoin Cash directly and are the honest place to start.
Same protocol lineage, same SHA-256, same 21-million cap — and three separate cryptocurrencies in the ranking. Applying the counting rule to its hardest case.
On 1 August the network activated a block-size upgrade; three weeks later a separate SegWit upgrade activated on the same network. Calling one "Bitcoin" and the other "a fork of Bitcoin" is inheritance by ticker, not by protocol history.
Universally called a soft fork because legacy nodes did not crash. On the mechanics, it was a hard fork wearing a soft-fork label — and the label decided which chain kept the BTC ticker.
Ten Bitcoin Core regtest nodes at six hashpower ratios; direct anyone-can-spend and BIP144 stripping tests on real Bitcoin Core 0.12.1; the precise split trigger isolated.
Posts about the BCH ecosystem specifically — CashTokens (protocol updates, notable issuances, DEX activity), wallet and node releases, merchant adoption, and BCH-scoped responses to news that affects the chain. Editorial voice matches the rest of the site: methodology upfront, sources cited, and every figure stamped with the data build it was read from.
The site-wide Blog argues for the counting rules that decide what the ranking counts as an asset. The site-wide Journal tracks what those rules produce as the data moves. This BCH blog does neither — it publishes about Bitcoin Cash the chain and its ecosystem, and lives here rather than in the site-wide blog because a BCH-scoped feed is what a reader following the chain wants.