ARIA NETWORK ranks #82 of 484 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #472: 390 of the 471 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 481 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 48% are tokens, 45% are claims on other assets, 7% are memecoins and under 1% are NFT collections.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #82 |
| Rank counting claims | #472 |
| Market capitalisation | $43M |
| Price | $0.2176 |
| Circulating supply | 200,000,000 ARIAX |
| Maximum supply | 200,000,000 ARIAX |
| Consensus family | Other |
| Consensus mechanism | — not yet curated |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 10 November 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. ARIA NETWORK's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Section and criteria | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | average of 2 criteria |
| By leader (its largest chain's market cap) (Source) | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| By family (all its chains' market cap) (Source) | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Supply | 9.1 | the supply scale times 0.9, and a point for a fixed cap that holds |
| Supply (21 million scores 10) | 9 | fixed maximum supply of 200 million |
| Distribution | — | not yet measured |
| Holder concentration (Source) | – | Not yet measured |
| Active addresses | – | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising (share sold) (Source) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | – | Not yet researched |
| Decentralisation | — | not yet measured |
| Governance (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | – | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Nodes (Source) | – | Not yet counted |
| Security | — | 1.1 of 3 points, 5 not yet measured source |
| Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Hashrate (Own work 5, its power 1 kW 0 to 10 GW 5; 1 point) | 1 | not mined: another consensus, 1 |
| Clients (Separate code and teams 10, separate code or teams 9, a fork by the same team or a stale second 8; one client: a new version within 12 months 7, 24 months 6, none in 24 months 5, none in 48 months 3; a second in development +0.5, a second seen running +1, 8 at most with one client; chain ended 0; 1 point) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | ✗ | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Scalability | — | too few measures yet source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 121, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 1.7 | a block every 3 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (24 MB or more 10: the ten busiest networks' median demand, 16.4 MB, and half again for growth) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | – | not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper abstract, §1, §2 and §11) | – | The site describes a Substrate NPoS chain with about 3-second blocks and a finality gadget, but its explorer shows no finalised height, so time to finality is not established. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | – | Not documented. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | – | Substrate light clients are possible but support for this chain is not documented. |
| Privacy | 0 | 0 of 10: whitepaper privacy 0 of 7, extra features 0 of 3, 2 not yet researched source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | – | No chain documentation or source was found showing whether holding or sending the coin carries an identity condition. |
| UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9) | 0 | An account ledger: one running balance for each address, so the remainder stays at the sending address and its payments share one public history. |
| HD addresses (A new address for each payment, unlinked · Whitepaper §10) | – | |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | 0 | No confidential transactions described. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | 0 | No sender or receiver hiding described. |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | 0 | Substrate-based chain; Substrate gossip has no origin hiding. |
| Programmability | — | 0 of 0 points, 9 not yet researched |
| Token issuance | – | A thinly documented Substrate-based NPoS chain; no primary source found on whether it runs smart contracts or an assets module open to anyone. |
| Smart contracts | – | A thinly documented Substrate NPoS chain (chain ID 134235) whose site lists only balances, staking, governance and treasury pallets; no source says whether user contracts exist. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | – | No multisig or vesting pallet is documented. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | – | No source on hash-lock or time-lock capability. |
| Native DEX (Trades the coin itself, not a claim) | – | No exchange pallet documented; ARIAX trades on Dex-Trade and Biconomy. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | – | No XCM or other messaging documented. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | – | No NFT pallet documented. |
| Demand | 3.4 | average of 5 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 1 | 1 exchange |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 3.6 | $659,449 traded in 24 hours; #778 by volume |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 7.3 | 1.5% of its market cap a day |
| Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | no order book on the nine exchanges read |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 4.1 | $43M, 4.1 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10) | 1 | its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet |
| Record | — | average of 3 criteria |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | — | Genesis date not yet researched |
| Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
| Conduct (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
Ten sections, weighted equally, each 0 to 10: consensus (the two ladders), supply (the supply scale and a fixed cap that holds), distribution (premine, fundraising, developer share, holders), decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes), security, scalability, privacy, programmability (what the scripting layer can do beyond the whitepaper's payment system), demand, and record (age, development, conduct). They are built from the criteria in the second table: privacy, scalability, security and decentralisation are the Cryptocurrency Standards among them, as follows: privacy (the whitepaper's three checks a base of 7 of 10, three extra features up to 3 more), scalability (four measures and three features), security (pool diversity, network activity, hashrate, clients and two checks) and decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: parts marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
200,000,000 of a maximum 200,000,000 ARIAX are in circulation — effectively all of them.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
ARIA NETWORK is #82 among cryptocurrencies and #472 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 390 places between ARIA NETWORK's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).