XPR Network ranks #79 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #425: 346 of the 424 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 433 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 55% are tokens, 37% are claims on other assets and 8% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | C · 54/100 · provisional, D to C |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #79 |
| Rank counting claims | #425 |
| Market capitalisation | $55M |
| Price | $0.00191 |
| Circulating supply | 28,652,669,445 XPR |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Proof of Stake |
| Consensus mechanism | DPoS (Antelope) |
| Network purpose | Payments |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
C — 54 out of 100, provisional (from 17 of 20 criteria, 28 October 2026 build). With what is not yet measured anywhere from nothing to full marks, the score would be 45 to 63 (D to C).
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 9.1 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 3.6 | group average, 9 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 6.6 | 3.3 of 5 points, 1 not yet measured source |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 2.9 | no fixed maximum; 28.7 billion in circulation: supply scale 5.7, cap 0 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✗ | 6 full years since its first recorded price, one halt, freeze or reversal in five years |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | – | |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 4 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $1.9e-7 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | node software open source; pruned nodes validate everything |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | — | too few measures yet source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 0 | a block every 0.5 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | 3.3 | 1 of 3 passed |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | ✗ | Blocks are 0.5 s, but API nodes still report legacy DPoS irreversibility about 330 blocks (about 2.8 minutes) behind head. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✓ | Antelope nodeos --block-log-retain-blocks keeps only recent blocks; nodes start from snapshots. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | XPR Network runs Antelope nodeos, and no user light client ships for the Antelope stack, so wallets trust API nodes. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | 5 | 5 of 9 points source |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | not mined |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | ✓ | 4.8% |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | ✓ | 14.3% |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | ✗ | 1 |
| Open source (Node software) | ✓ | XPR runs the AntelopeIO Leap/Spring client (MIT) maintained by the Antelope coalition; Metallicus (Metal) controls the XPR-specific system contracts and roadmap. |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | ✓ | about 960,000 a day |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Decentralisation | 3.1 | section average, 6 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | 0 | An authority can halt the chain or freeze funds: As on all Antelope chains, a 15-of-21 block-producer multisig (eosio.prods) holds privileged rights to change any account's code or keys; XPR producers must be approved and KYC-verified. source |
| No central team (Source) | 0 | A central team directs it: XPR runs the AntelopeIO Leap/Spring client (MIT) maintained by the Antelope coalition; Metallicus (Metal) controls the XPR-specific system contracts and roadmap. source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 8.6 | Proof of stake: 8.6 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | 4.4 | 21 reachable nodes source |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 2.7 | 73.5% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. 10B XPR at genesis (2020: 151M airdrop to MTL/LNX holders, 100M to venture investors in Metallicus, 1.1B founder/employee grants, 8.65B development) plus 14B added by the Feb 2022 'Phoenix' proposal (10B to Metallicus, 2B community, 1.5B marketing, 0.5B BPs) = 24B allocated by the developer, against on-chain supply 32,633,263,008 XPR (eosio.token, 2026-10-23); genesis alone is 30.6%. source |
| Fundraising | 2.7 | Sold by its issuer or insiders: 73.5% of supply was theirs to sell, 0.3% sold so far. No XPR sale was held. The only investor-delivered XPR is the 100M granted at genesis (2020) to venture investors in Metallicus, counted here like token warrants: 100M / 32,633,263,008 on-chain supply (eosio.token, 2026-10-23) = 0.3%. The airdrop to MTL/LNX holders is excluded, even though MTL had its own 2017 sale. 100M XPR granted to early (venture) investors in Metallicus, the core developer; XPR itself was not sold in an ICO (airdropped to MTL/LNX holders; MTL had its own 2017 token sale). source |
| Developer share (after launch) | — | Not yet researched |
| Privacy | 2 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2 | 1 of 5 passed source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Accounts are created by an existing account paying for RAM; the Antelope system contracts carry no identity check. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | ✗ | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | Antelope nodeos relays transactions directly. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | No confidential transactions. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | No sender or receiver hiding. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 7.8 | 7 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance (At protocol level) | 2 | Antelope token contracts (eosio.token standard), which any account with enough RAM can deploy. |
| Smart contracts (General-purpose) | 2 | Antelope Wasm contracts (with a TypeScript SDK), deployable by any account that buys RAM. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | Antelope permission thresholds and the eosio.msig proposal contract, plus time-locked contracts. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | Wasm contracts can hold funds against a hash preimage with a timeout refund (HTLC). |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange in the protocol; Metal X is a contract-based DEX. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | No protocol messaging to other chains documented. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✓ | AtomicAssets-style NFT contracts on the Antelope runtime. |
| Supply & Demand | 6.2 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 6.7 | average of 6 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 10 | 12 exchanges |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 3.8 | $882,302 traded in 24 hours; #718 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 30, $817,042) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 6.7 | 1.2% of its market cap a day, median of the last 30 days |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | 5.5 | $25,297 within 2% of the price on 3 exchanges, 0.05% of its market cap, median of the last 2 days; a lower bound: the books returned by 1 of them stop short of 2% |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 4.3 | $55M, 4.3 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | 10 | no futures, options or margin on the exchanges read |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 5.7 | no fixed maximum; 28.7 billion in circulation |
| Record | 7 | group average |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | 9 | 2 positive, 1 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| Negative record | ||
| Halt, freeze or reversal, 2026-09-12 | ✗ | After a roughly $9M exploit of the proton.swaps contract (a withdrawal function accepted negative amounts), elected block producers patched the contract at 21:32 UTC and at 23:26 UTC seized about 1.80 billion XPR from the attacker, placing it under community control; the chain kept producing blocks. |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 6 | 6 full years since 2020-04-06, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 6 | 1 positive, 0 negative, 4 not yet researched source |
| Positive | ||
| Steady work, 6 of 6 | ✓ | 1 commit in 1 of the last 12 months (github.com/AntelopeIO/spring); Runs the Antelope (Spring) reference client; Spring v1.2.2 released 2025-08-19 (1.1.5, 1.2.0, 1.2.1 in 2025). |
| Not yet researched | ||
| Shipped a security fix in two years | – | |
| Shipped a privacy improvement in two years | – | |
| Shipped a scaling upgrade in two years | – | |
| Shipped a new capability for users in two years | – | |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
28,652,669,445 XPR are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 73.5% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Sold by the issuer or insiders | 0.3% of today's supply |
| Nodes or validators | 21 |
| Fundraising | Private or venture funding |
10B XPR at genesis (2020: 151M airdrop to MTL/LNX holders, 100M to venture investors in Metallicus, 1.1B founder/employee grants, 8.65B development) plus 14B added by the Feb 2022 'Phoenix' proposal (10B to Metallicus, 2B community, 1.5B marketing, 0.5B BPs) = 24B allocated by the developer, against on-chain supply 32,633,263,008 XPR (eosio.token, 2026-10-23); genesis alone is 30.6%.
100M XPR granted to early (venture) investors in Metallicus, the core developer; XPR itself was not sold in an ICO (airdropped to MTL/LNX holders; MTL had its own 2017 token sale).
No XPR sale was held. The only investor-delivered XPR is the 100M granted at genesis (2020) to venture investors in Metallicus, counted here like token warrants: 100M / 32,633,263,008 on-chain supply (eosio.token, 2026-10-23) = 0.3%. The airdrop to MTL/LNX holders is excluded, even though MTL had its own 2017 sale.
Not established. On-chain, inflation is 4%/yr (continuous_rate 0.0392 = ln 1.04; supply 32.64B). Block producers take part of it, and the rest flows through eosio.saving, which holds 134.6M XPR. A 2024 governance poll described the 4% as 1% block producers, 1% Consortium (ecosystem companies), 1% staking and 1% XPR/USDC yield farm, and voted to drop the Consortium's 1%. With the rate still at 4%, whether that 1% was removed or redirected, and the current eosio.saving split, could not be confirmed.
Sources: xprnetwork.org · explorer.xprnetwork.org · proton.greymass.com · gov.xprnetwork.org · cdn.metallicus.com · proton.greymass.com. Researched 2026-10-24, low confidence.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
XPR Network is #79 among cryptocurrencies and #425 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 346 places between XPR Network's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).