Radworks (RAD)

RAD price chart

Radworks ranks #133 of 484 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #787: 654 of the 786 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 1052 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 57% are tokens, 33% are claims on other assets, 9% are memecoins and 1% are NFT collections.

CoinSpectrum Gradepending — launch under review
Rank among cryptocurrencies#133
Rank counting claims#787
Market capitalisation$13M
Price$0.2226
Circulating supply59,053,424 RAD
Maximum supply99,999,620 RAD
Consensus familyOther
Consensus mechanism— not yet curated
Ledger typeSingle-asset ledger

Market figures from the 10 November 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.

CoinSpectrum Grade (Source)

Grade pending. Radworks's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.

Section and criteriaScoreBasis
Consensus—average of 2 criteria
By leader (its largest chain's market cap) (Source)—Consensus not yet reviewed
By family (all its chains' market cap) (Source)—Consensus not yet reviewed
Supply9.4the supply scale times 0.9, and a point for a fixed cap that holds
Supply (21 million scores 10)9.3fixed maximum supply of 100 million
Distribution—not yet measured
Holder concentration (Source)–Not yet measured
Active addresses–Not yet measured
Premine (allocated at launch)–Launch not yet researched
Fundraising (share sold) (Source)–Launch not yet researched
Developer share (after launch)–Not yet researched
Decentralisation—not yet measured
Governance (Source)–Not yet researched
No central team (Source)–Not yet researched
Who can mint (Source)–Consensus not yet reviewed
Nodes (Source)–Not yet counted
Security—0.1 of 1 points, 7 not yet measured
Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points)–
Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points)–
Hashrate (Own work 5, its power 1 kW 0 to 10 GW 5; 1 point)1not mined: another consensus, 1
Clients (Separate code and teams 10, separate code or teams 9, a fork by the same team or a stale second 8; one client: a new version within 12 months 7, 24 months 6, none in 24 months 5, none in 48 months 3; a second in development +0.5, a second seen running +1, 8 at most with one client; chain ended 0; 1 point)–
Open source (Node software)–
No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years)–
Scalability—not yet measured
Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0)–not yet measured
Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 121, the median of the ten busiest, 5)–not yet measured
Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side)–not yet measured
Block space per 10 minutes (24 MB or more 10: the ten busiest networks' median demand, 16.4 MB, and half again for growth)–not yet measured
Features (3 checks)–not yet researched
Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper abstract, §1, §2 and §11)–
Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7)–
Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8)–
Privacy—0 of 6 passed, 6 not yet measured
Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10)–
UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9)–
HD addresses (A new address for each payment, unlinked · Whitepaper §10)–
Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential)–
Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden)–
Network privacy (Origin hidden by default)–
Programmability—0 of 0 points, 9 not yet researched
Token issuance–
Smart contracts–
Multisig and time locks (Without a third party)–
Atomic swaps (With other chains)–
Native DEX (Trades the coin itself, not a claim)–
Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself)–
NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules)–
Demand6.5average of 7 measures
Exchanges (10 or more: 10)1010 exchanges
Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10)4$526,767 traded in 24 hours; #625 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 15, $1,057,869)
Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10)9.17.3% of its market cap a day, median of the last 16 days
Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10)8.8$58,042 within 2% of the price on 5 exchanges, 0.44% of its market cap, median of the last 13 days
Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10)2.8$13M, 2.8 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold
Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0)10no futures, options or margin on the exchanges read
Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10)1its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet
Record—average of 3 criteria
Age (years since genesis) (Source)55 full years since 2021-02-28, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated).
Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities)—Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research
Conduct (origin, claims, halts)—Not yet reviewed

Ten sections, weighted equally, each 0 to 10: consensus (the two ladders), supply (the supply scale and a fixed cap that holds), distribution (premine, fundraising, developer share, holders), decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes), security, scalability, privacy, programmability (what the scripting layer can do beyond the whitepaper's payment system), demand, and record (age, development, conduct). They are built from the criteria in the second table: privacy, scalability, security and decentralisation are the Cryptocurrency Standards among them, as follows: privacy (the whitepaper's three checks a base of 7 of 10, three extra features up to 3 more), scalability (four measures and three features), security (pool diversity, network activity, hashrate, clients and two checks) and decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: parts marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.

Other coins

Internet Computer ICPAStacks STXARitual RITUALTensorCash TSCShentu CTKBitcoin Diamond BCDApertum APTMBAll Other chains →

Proof of Work coins

Bitcoin BTCA+Zcash ZECA+Dogecoin DOGEA+Monero XMRA+Bitcoin Cash BCHA++Litecoin LTCA+Ethereum Classic ETCAAll Proof of Work chains →

Supply

59,053,424 of a maximum 99,999,620 RAD are in circulation — 59.1% of the total that will ever exist.

What a regulator has said

No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.

The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.

How CoinSpectrum ranks Radworks

Radworks is #133 among cryptocurrencies and #787 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 654 places between Radworks's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.

The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).