TAC Protocol ranks #163 of 484 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #1129: 966 of the 1128 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 1380 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 60% are tokens, 32% are claims on other assets, 7% are memecoins and 1% are NFT collections.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #163 |
| Rank counting claims | #1129 |
| Market capitalisation | $6M |
| Price | $0.000942 |
| Circulating supply | 6,156,312,240 TAC |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Other |
| Consensus mechanism | — not yet curated |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 10 November 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. TAC Protocol's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Section and criteria | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | average of 2 criteria |
| By leader (its largest chain's market cap) (Source) | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| By family (all its chains' market cap) (Source) | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Supply | 6.8 | the supply scale times 0.9, and a point for a fixed cap that holds |
| Supply (21 million scores 10) | 7.5 | no fixed maximum; 6.16 billion in circulation |
| Distribution | — | not yet measured |
| Holder concentration (Source) | – | Not yet measured |
| Active addresses | – | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising (share sold) (Source) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | – | Not yet researched |
| Decentralisation | — | not yet measured |
| Governance (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | – | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Nodes (Source) | – | Not yet counted |
| Security | — | 0.1 of 1 points, 7 not yet measured |
| Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Hashrate (Own work 5, its power 1 kW 0 to 10 GW 5; 1 point) | 1 | not mined: another consensus, 1 |
| Clients (Separate code and teams 10, separate code or teams 9, a fork by the same team or a stale second 8; one client: a new version within 12 months 7, 24 months 6, none in 24 months 5, none in 48 months 3; a second in development +0.5, a second seen running +1, 8 at most with one client; chain ended 0; 1 point) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Scalability | 8.1 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $0.0000112 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 121, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 10 | about 2,733 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 0.7 | a block every 1.57 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (24 MB or more 10: the ten busiest networks' median demand, 16.4 MB, and half again for growth) | 10 | 9 MB limit (converted from its gas, compute, mass or count limit), 3440 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 10 | 2 of 2 passed, 1 not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper abstract, §1, §2 and §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✓ | Cosmos SDK state pruning and CometBFT state sync. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | CometBFT light client protocol verifies signed headers against the validator set. |
| Privacy | 7 | 7 of 10: whitepaper privacy 7 of 7, extra features 0 of 3, 2 not yet researched source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | 10 | Any key can hold and send TAC; the Cosmos SDK bank and auth modules carry no identity check. |
| UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| HD addresses (A new address for each payment, unlinked · Whitepaper §10) | – | |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | 0 | Public EVM ledger. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | 0 | Accounts are public. |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | 0 | CometBFT mempool gossip with no Dandelion or built-in Tor. |
| Programmability | 7.8 | 7 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance (At protocol level) | 2 | Cosmos EVM Layer 1 whose live EVM params set contract creation to ACCESS_TYPE_PERMISSIONLESS, so any account can deploy ERC-20 contracts; mainnet since July 2025. |
| Smart contracts (General-purpose) | 2 | Cosmos EVM Layer 1 with permissionless contract creation; mainnet since July 2025. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | Multisig and time-lock contracts on its EVM, plus Cosmos SDK multisig keys and x/auth/vesting. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | Solidity HTLCs can be deployed on its EVM. |
| Native DEX (Trades the coin itself, not a claim) | ✗ | No DEX found trading the coin itself: none on its own chain (DefiLlama), and not on THORChain, Maya, Chainflip, Komodo DeFi, BasicSwap, Bisq or Haveno (checked 2026-11-04). |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | IBC modules are compiled in but no IBC channels are open on mainnet; the TON adapter is run by a sequencer network. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✓ | ERC-721 contracts run by its EVM, and the Cosmos SDK x/nft module is in the app. |
| Demand | 4.8 | average of 7 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 5 | 5 exchanges |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 3 | $269,845 traded in 24 hours; #1065 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 30, $318,185) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 9.8 | 4.7% of its market cap a day, median of the last 30 days |
| Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | 10 | $71,448 within 2% of the price on 4 exchanges, 1.2% of its market cap, median of the last 15 days |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 1.9 | $5.8M, 1.9 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | 3.1 | futures, options and margin positions 47% of its market cap |
| Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10) | 1 | its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet |
| Record | — | average of 3 criteria |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 1 | 1 full year since 2025-07-15, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
| Conduct (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
Ten sections, weighted equally, each 0 to 10: consensus (the two ladders), supply (the supply scale and a fixed cap that holds), distribution (premine, fundraising, developer share, holders), decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes), security, scalability, privacy, programmability (what the scripting layer can do beyond the whitepaper's payment system), demand, and record (age, development, conduct). They are built from the criteria in the second table: privacy, scalability, security and decentralisation are the Cryptocurrency Standards among them, as follows: privacy (the whitepaper's three checks a base of 7 of 10, three extra features up to 3 more), scalability (four measures and three features), security (pool diversity, network activity, hashrate, clients and two checks) and decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: parts marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
6,156,312,240 TAC are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
TAC Protocol is #163 among cryptocurrencies and #1129 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 966 places between TAC Protocol's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).