Blockchain Foundation for Innovation & Collaboration (BFIC)
Blockchain Foundation for Innovation & Collaboration ranks #207 of 484 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #1631: 1424 of the 1630 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 1911 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 61% are tokens, 32% are claims on other assets, 5% are memecoins and 1% are NFT collections.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — no market data |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #207 |
| Rank counting claims | #1631 |
| Market capitalisation | $2M |
| Price | $0.1667 |
| Circulating supply | 10,578,424 BFIC |
| Maximum supply | 21,000,000 BFIC |
| Consensus family | Proof of Authority |
| Consensus mechanism | IBFT (PoA, EVM, company-run) |
| Network purpose | Smart-contract platform |
| Ledger type | Multi-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 10 November 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
CoinSpectrum Grade (Source)
Grade pending. No market cap or no daily volume is reported for Blockchain Foundation for Innovation & Collaboration by any source the site reads. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Section and criteria | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | 7.3 | average of 2 criteria |
| By leader (its largest chain's market cap) (Source) | 7.3 | Proof of authority: 7.3 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| By family (all its chains' market cap) (Source) | 7.3 | Proof of authority: 7.3 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Supply | 10 | fixed maximum supply of 21 million |
| Distribution | 5 | average of 2 parts |
| Holder concentration (Source) | – | Not yet measured |
| Active addresses | – | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 0 | 100% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. BFIC runs on the project's own proof-of-authority chain (aggregators also describe it as proof-of-stake), with a planned 'proof-of-contribution' chain not yet launched. No open mining or open validator issuance was found, so all supply is issuer-controlled. source |
| Fundraising (share sold) (Source) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. No cut found and no open issuance: BFIC runs on a project-run proof-of-authority chain with an issuer-controlled supply; no block-reward split to a treasury is documented. source |
| Decentralisation | 0 | average of 2 parts |
| Governance (Source) | 0 | An authority can halt the chain or freeze funds |
| No central team (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | 0 | Run by a company: one company or foundation validates every block |
| Nodes (Source) | – | Not yet counted |
| Security | — | 0.1 of 1 points, 7 not yet measured |
| Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Hashrate (Own work 5, its power 1 kW 0 to 10 GW 5; 1 point) | 1 | not mined: another consensus, 1 |
| Clients (Separate code and teams 10, separate code or teams 9, a fork by the same team or a stale second 8; one client: a new version within 12 months 7, 24 months 6, none in 24 months 5, none in 48 months 3; a second in development +0.5, a second seen running +1, 8 at most with one client; chain ended 0; 1 point) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Scalability | — | too few measures yet source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 121, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 2.5 | a block every 5 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (24 MB or more 10: the ten busiest networks' median demand, 16.4 MB, and half again for growth) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | – | not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper abstract, §1, §2 and §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | – | No public node software. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | – | No public node software; the listed RPCs did not answer. |
| Privacy | 0 | 0 of 10: whitepaper privacy 0 of 7, extra features 0 of 3, 3 not yet researched source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | – | bfic.io redirects to a parked page and no explorer, RPC or chain registry entry was found, so the chain cannot be examined. |
| UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| HD addresses (A new address for each payment, unlinked · Whitepaper §10) | – | |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | 0 | Account-based EVM chain with public balances and transfer amounts. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | 0 | Sender and receiver addresses are public; no ring signatures, ZK sender proofs or stealth addresses in the protocol. |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | 0 | Devp2p relays transactions directly from the sending node; no Dandelion-style relay or built-in Tor. |
| Programmability | — | 0 of 0 points, 9 not yet researched |
| Token issuance | – | Described as a company-run IBFT EVM chain, but no working website, explorer or RPC could be found to confirm the chain is live or whether contract deployment is open. |
| Smart contracts | – | bfic.io now redirects to a parked lander page and no explorer or RPC was found, so the chain's liveness and configuration cannot be established. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| Native DEX (Trades the coin itself, not a claim) | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| Demand | 0.5 | average of 3 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 0 | no exchange the site reads trades it |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | – | no volume reported |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | no order book on the nine exchanges read |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 0.6 | $1.8M, 0.6 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10) | 1 | its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet |
| Record | — | average of 3 criteria |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 4 | 4 full years since 2022-03-14, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
| Conduct (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
Ten sections, weighted equally, each 0 to 10: consensus (the two ladders), supply (the supply scale and a fixed cap that holds), distribution (premine, fundraising, developer share, holders), decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes), security, scalability, privacy, programmability (what the scripting layer can do beyond the whitepaper's payment system), demand, and record (age, development, conduct). They are built from the criteria in the second table: privacy, scalability, security and decentralisation are the Cryptocurrency Standards among them, as follows: privacy (the whitepaper's three checks a base of 7 of 10, three extra features up to 3 more), scalability (four measures and three features), security (pool diversity, network activity, hashrate, clients and two checks) and decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: parts marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
Proof of Authority coins
Bittensor TAOA
VeChain VETB
Ozone Chain OZOB
DucatusX DUCXC
BlackFort Exchange Network BXN
Humanode HMND
TTcoin Network TCAll Proof of Authority chains →Proof of Work coins
Bitcoin BTCA+
Zcash ZECA+
Dogecoin DOGEA+
Monero XMRA+
Bitcoin Cash BCHA++
Litecoin LTCA+
Ethereum Classic ETCAAll Proof of Work chains →Supply
10,578,424 of a maximum 21,000,000 BFIC are in circulation — 50.4% of the total that will ever exist.
Launch and allocation
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 100% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
BFIC runs on the project's own proof-of-authority chain (aggregators also describe it as proof-of-stake), with a planned 'proof-of-contribution' chain not yet launched. No open mining or open validator issuance was found, so all supply is issuer-controlled.
Not established; no public documentation of a sale, presale or investors was found.
No cut found and no open issuance: BFIC runs on a project-run proof-of-authority chain with an issuer-controlled supply; no block-reward split to a treasury is documented.
Thinly documented. Circulating supply reports conflict (1.9M vs 10.58M). The 100 follows the method's rule for chains without open minting and is not based on a published allocation table.
Sources: bfic.network · coingecko.com · coinmarketcap.com · coingecko.com · cryptoslate.com. Researched 2026-10-24, low confidence.
What a regulator has said
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
How CoinSpectrum ranks Blockchain Foundation for Innovation & Collaboration
Blockchain Foundation for Innovation & Collaboration is #207 among cryptocurrencies and #1631 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 1424 places between Blockchain Foundation for Innovation & Collaboration's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).