Evrmore (EVR)
Evrmore ranks #287 of 489 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #1891: 1604 of the 1890 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 2955 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 81% are tokens, 16% are claims on other assets and 3% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #287 |
| Rank counting claims | #1891 |
| Market capitalisation | $219,558 |
| Price | $0.0000219 |
| Maximum supply | 15,369,186,206 EVR |
| Consensus family | Proof of Work |
| Consensus mechanism | EvrProgPow (KAWPOW-family, GPU) |
| Own hashrate | 1.44 GH/s |
| Network purpose | Financial ledger |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 30 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
CoinSpectrum Grade (Source)
Grade pending. Evrmore's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 10 | group average |
| By family (all its chains' market cap) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| By leader (its largest chain's market cap) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | — | group average, 0 of 4 measured |
| Privacy (6 checks) (Source) | — | 0 of 6 passed, 6 not yet measured |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | – | |
| UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| HD addresses (New addresses from one public key, unlinked) | – | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | – | |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | – | |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | – | |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | — | too few measures yet |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) (Portability · Medium of exchange) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) (Portability · Medium of exchange) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 6.4 | a block every 1 minute |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | – | not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Portability · Medium of exchange · Whitepaper §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Verifiability · Store of value · Whitepaper §7) | – | |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Verifiability · Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | – | |
| Security (miner pay, pool diversity, network activity and 4 checks) | — | 1 of 3 points, 7 not yet measured |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | about $39 a day |
| Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✓ | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | – | |
| Open source (Node software · Verifiability · Store of value) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years · Durability · Store of value) | – | |
| Decentralisation (8 checks and scales) (Source) | — | too few measures yet |
| Censorship resistant (Durability · Store of value) (Source) | 10 | No authority can halt the chain or freeze funds |
| No central team (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | 10 | Open to anyone with hardware: anyone can produce blocks by mining or proof of space, no permission or stake needed |
| Nodes (Source) | – | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | – | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising (share sold) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | – | Not yet researched |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | — | 0 of 0 points, 9 not yet researched |
| Token issuance | – | |
| Smart contracts | – | |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | – | |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | – | |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | – | |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | – | |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | – | |
| Supply & Demand | 3.2 | group average |
| Supply (21 million scores 10) | 6.2 | fixed maximum supply of 15.4 billion |
| Demand (7 measures) (Source) | 0.2 | average of 5 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 0 | no exchange the site reads trades it |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0 | $55 traded in 24 hours; #4050 by volume |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 0 | 0.03% of its market cap a day |
| Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | no order book on the nine exchanges read |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 0 | $220K, 0 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10) | 1 | its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet |
| Record | 2 | group average, 1 of 3 measured |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 2 | 2 full years since 2024-05-24, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
| Conduct (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
Twelve criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards are four of them: privacy (six checks), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay, pool diversity, network activity and four checks) and decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
Proof of Work coins
Bitcoin BTCA+
Zcash ZECA+
Dogecoin DOGEB
BitcoinII BC2
FACTOR FACT
Karlsen KLSC
Feathercoin FTCAll Proof of Work chains →Proof of Stake coins
Ethereum ETHA
BNB BNBA
Solana SOLA
TRON TRXB
Hyperliquid HYPEC
Cardano ADAB
NEAR Protocol NEARAAll Proof of Stake chains →Supply
Circulating supply is not published by our source.
The work behind it
Evrmore is secured by 1.44 GH/s of its own work. Hashrate does not compare across algorithms — a SHA-256 hash and a Scrypt hash cost different amounts to produce.
What a regulator has said
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
How CoinSpectrum ranks Evrmore
Evrmore is #287 among cryptocurrencies and #1891 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 1604 places between Evrmore's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).