SIBCoin (SIB)
SIBCoin ranks #409 of 484 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #5468: 5059 of the 5467 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — no market data |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #409 |
| Rank counting claims | #5468 |
| Price | $0.0171 |
| Circulating supply | 0 SIB |
| Maximum supply | 29,000,000 SIB |
| Consensus family | Proof of Work |
| Consensus mechanism | X11GOST (Streebog) + masternodes (Dash fork) |
| Own hashrate | — |
| Network purpose | Payments |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 10 November 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
CoinSpectrum Grade (Source)
Grade pending. No market cap or no daily volume is reported for SIBCoin by any source the site reads. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Section and criteria | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | 10 | average of 2 criteria |
| By leader (its largest chain's market cap) (Source) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| By family (all its chains' market cap) (Source) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Supply | 9.9 | fixed maximum supply of 29 million |
| Distribution | — | not yet measured |
| Holder concentration (Source) | – | Not yet measured |
| Active addresses | – | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | – | No genesis allocation found in the code (a 2016 copy). Lead developer Ivan Rublev told ForkLog (February 2017) there was no premine, but mining began on a Novosibirsk forum before the BitcoinTalk thread, and critics called those early low-difficulty coins a premine. The amount is not documented. |
| Fundraising (share sold) (Source) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | – | Developer share: 10% of each new block reward goes to them today. The Dash-derived GetBlockValue (2016 copy of the code) cuts the block value by 10% from height 328,008 to fund masternode-voted budget superblocks; the project site still shows budget proposals and superblock payments. Today's rule could not be checked because the main repository (ivansib/sibcoin) no longer exists, and the issued share was not computed. source |
| Decentralisation | 6.7 | average of 3 parts |
| Governance (Source) | 10 | No authority can halt the chain or freeze funds: Dash-style sporks let the developers toggle network features, but no key can freeze or claw back coins. source |
| No central team (Source) | 0 | A central team directs it: Developed by the SIBCoin core team from Novosibirsk (lead Ivan Rublev, GitHub ivansib / Sibcoin-developers). source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 10 | Open to anyone with hardware: anyone can produce blocks by mining, no permission needed |
| Nodes (Source) | – | Not yet counted |
| Security | — | 2 of 2 points, 6 not yet measured source |
| Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Hashrate (Own work 5, its power 1 kW 0 to 10 GW 5; 1 point) | – | |
| Clients (Separate code and teams 10, separate code or teams 9, a fork by the same team or a stale second 8; one client: a new version within 12 months 7, 24 months 6, none in 24 months 5, none in 48 months 3; a second in development +0.5, a second seen running +1, 8 at most with one client; chain ended 0; 1 point) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | ✓ | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Scalability | — | too few measures yet source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 121, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 7.8 | a block every 2.5 minutes |
| Block space per 10 minutes (24 MB or more 10: the ten busiest networks' median demand, 16.4 MB, and half again for growth) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | 6.7 | 2 of 3 passed |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper abstract, §1, §2 and §11) | ✓ | Dash-derived InstantX transaction locks by masternodes (present in the code); whether the masternode network still provides them is unverified. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✗ | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): no -prune option; the node keeps the full block history. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): proof-of-work chain whose node serves BIP37 bloom-filtered merkleblock proofs, so an SPV client can check headers and Merkle proofs. |
| Privacy | 7 | 7 of 10: whitepaper privacy 7 of 7, extra features 0 of 3, 1 not yet researched source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | 10 | SIBCoin's Bitcoin-derived node (zebbra2014/sibcoin) has no identity rule: anyone generates keys and receives and sends the coin. |
| UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9) | 10 | Coins are separate unspent outputs: a payment spends whole outputs and sends the change to a new address, so the coins in one wallet need not share a history. |
| HD addresses (A new address for each payment, unlinked · Whitepaper §10) | – | |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | 0 | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): Bitcoin-style transparent outputs; no confidential amounts. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | 0 | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): Bitcoin-style transparent addresses; no ring signatures, zero-knowledge spends or stealth addresses. |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | 0 | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): no Dandelion relay in the node; Tor is only an optional proxy setting (-tor/-onion) the user must configure. |
| Programmability | 1.1 | 1 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts (Scripting for spending conditions) | 1 | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): Bitcoin-style Script (signatures, hashes, CHECKMULTISIG) limited to spending conditions; no contract platform. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✗ | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): CHECKMULTISIG is present, but the script interpreter has no OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY or OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (the code base predates BIP65/BIP112), so no output can be time-locked. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✗ | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): without a lock-time opcode Script cannot express the refund branch of an HTLC, and no adaptor-signature swap exists for the coin. |
| Native DEX (Trades the coin itself, not a claim) | ✗ | No DEX found trading the coin itself: none on its own chain (DefiLlama), and not on THORChain, Maya, Chainflip, Komodo DeFi, BasicSwap, Bisq or Haveno (checked 2026-11-04). |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): no cross-chain message or light-client verification in the protocol. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | SibCoin v0.16.0 source (2015 mirror; last client 0.16.2.0, 2018, source gone): no token or NFT type in the consensus rules. |
| Demand | 0.5 | average of 2 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 0 | no exchange the site reads trades it |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | – | no volume reported |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | not measured |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | – | not measured |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10) | 1 | its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet |
| Record | 6.7 | average of 3 criteria |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 10 | 11 full years since 2015-09-25, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities) | 0 | 0 positive, 4 negative source |
| Negative | ||
| Steady work, 0 of 6 | ✗ | The reference repository ivansib/sibcoin returns 404 and no release in the last 24 months could be found; sibcoin.org and sibblockchain.com do not respond and sibcoin.net now hosts an unrelated site. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-03, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2020-14198: misbehaving peers are auto-banned into an unbounded ban list, so many attacker addresses (cheap with IPv6) can exhaust memory; still in SIBCoin 0.16.2.0. bitcoincore.org git.altlinux.org git.altlinux.org |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-31, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-52919: addr-message spam can overflow the address manager's 32-bit id counter and crash the node, with no addr rate limit; still in SIBCoin 0.16.2.0. bitcoincore.org git.altlinux.org |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-09-18, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2019-25220: a long low-difficulty header chain can exhaust memory because the node has no headers pre-synchronisation; still in SIBCoin 0.16.2.0. bitcoincore.org git.altlinux.org |
| Conduct (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
Ten sections, weighted equally, each 0 to 10: consensus (the two ladders), supply (the supply scale and a fixed cap that holds), distribution (premine, fundraising, developer share, holders), decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes), security, scalability, privacy, programmability (what the scripting layer can do beyond the whitepaper's payment system), demand, and record (age, development, conduct). They are built from the criteria in the second table: privacy, scalability, security and decentralisation are the Cryptocurrency Standards among them, as follows: privacy (the whitepaper's three checks a base of 7 of 10, three extra features up to 3 more), scalability (four measures and three features), security (pool diversity, network activity, hashrate, clients and two checks) and decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: parts marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
Proof of Work coins
Bitcoin BTCA+
Zcash ZECA+
Dogecoin DOGEA+
GuccioneCoin GCC
Eurocoin EUC
Adzcoin ADZ
Francs FRNAll Proof of Work chains →Proof of Stake coins
Ethereum ETHA+
BNB BNBA
Solana SOLA+
TRON TRXA
Hyperliquid HYPEB
Cardano ADAA
NEAR Protocol NEARAAll Proof of Stake chains →Supply
0 of a maximum 29,000,000 SIB are in circulation — 0.0% of the total that will ever exist.
Launch and allocation
| Developer share of new coins today | 10% |
|---|
No genesis allocation found in the code (a 2016 copy). Lead developer Ivan Rublev told ForkLog (February 2017) there was no premine, but mining began on a Novosibirsk forum before the BitcoinTalk thread, and critics called those early low-difficulty coins a premine. The amount is not documented.
Not established; genesis 2015-05-08 ('RT.COM 08/May/2015 World marks WWII victory day'), a Dash fork by a Novosibirsk team.
Not established.
The Dash-derived GetBlockValue (2016 copy of the code) cuts the block value by 10% from height 328,008 to fund masternode-voted budget superblocks; the project site still shows budget proposals and superblock payments. Today's rule could not be checked because the main repository (ivansib/sibcoin) no longer exists, and the issued share was not computed.
Code facts come from a January 2016 fork (zebbra2014/sibcoin) because the official repository is gone. The 10% budget cut is Dash's rule copied verbatim, with Dash's activation height.
Sources: raw.githubusercontent.com · github.com · sibcoin.money · forklog.com · news.bitcoin.com. Researched 2026-10-26, low confidence.
The work behind it
No source we can reach publishes a hashrate for SIBCoin.
What a regulator has said
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
How CoinSpectrum ranks SIBCoin
SIBCoin is #409 among cryptocurrencies and #5468 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 5059 places between SIBCoin's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).