Abey ranks #88 of 484 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #524: 436 of the 523 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 532 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 49% are tokens, 43% are claims on other assets, 7% are memecoins and 1% are NFT collections.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #88 |
| Rank counting claims | #524 |
| Market capitalisation | $38M |
| Price | $0.0360 |
| Circulating supply | 1,044,724,064 ABEY |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Hybrid |
| Consensus mechanism | DPoS/PBFT + PoW oversight |
| Own hashrate | — |
| Ledger type | Multi-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 10 November 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. What Abey pays its miners is not yet measured. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Section and criteria | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | 4.5 | average of 2 criteria |
| By leader (its largest chain's market cap) (Source) | 4.5 | Hybrid: 4.5 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| By family (all its chains' market cap) (Source) | 4.5 | Hybrid: 4.5 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Supply | 7.5 | the supply scale times 0.9, and a point for a fixed cap that holds |
| Supply (21 million scores 10) | 8.3 | no fixed maximum; 1.04 billion in circulation |
| Distribution | 5.3 | average of 2 parts |
| Holder concentration (Source) | – | Not yet measured |
| Active addresses | – | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 0.5 | 94.9% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. DefaultGenesisBlock in core/genesis.go allocates 1,000,000,000 ABEY at genesis (990,000,000 to 0xEc1F80E553Bf43229EBA70d254E09DD188D604f2 plus 1,000,000 to each of 10 initial committee addresses); 1.0B / ~1.054B circulating today = ~94.9%. Recipients are not publicly named; the ABEY Foundation (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) controls the project. source |
| Fundraising (share sold) (Source) | – | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. The reward code (consensus/minerva/consensus.go) pays PoW block and fruit miners and the PoS committee/stakers; no developer or foundation output was found (a developerCoin variable survives only in a commented-out log line). Since the TIP9 upgrade (fast block 8,742,700) only committee (staking) rewards are paid, starting at 119.8368 ABEY per block halving every 25,000,000 blocks. source |
| Decentralisation | 4 | average of 2 parts |
| Governance (Source) | – | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | 0 | A central team directs it: Gabey, the only node (a TrueChain fork), is developed by the Abey Foundation. source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 8 | Open, with a stake vote: anyone can mine, and stakeholders vote on the blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | – | Not yet counted |
| Security | 6.4 | 3.2 of 5 points, 3 not yet measured source |
| Pool diversity (Largest pool 50% 0 to 20% 10, largest three 90% 0 to 50% 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Network activity (Transactions a day, 250 0, 500,000 or more 10; 2 points) | 3.4 | about 3,434 transactions a day |
| Hashrate (Own work 5, its power 1 kW 0 to 10 GW 5; 1 point) | – | |
| Clients (Separate code and teams 10, separate code or teams 9, a fork by the same team or a stale second 8; one client: a new version within 12 months 7, 24 months 6, none in 24 months 5, none in 48 months 3; a second in development +0.5, a second seen running +1, 8 at most with one client; chain ended 0; 1 point) | 5 | one client, no new version in 24 months (latest Dec 2023) |
| Open source (Node software) | ✓ | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Scalability | 7.6 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $0.000013 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 121, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 5.4 | about 152 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 2.5 | a block every 5 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (24 MB or more 10: the ten busiest networks' median demand, 16.4 MB, and half again for growth) | 10 | 0.235 MB limit (converted from its gas, compute, mass or count limit), 28.2 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 10 | 1 of 1 passed, 2 not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper abstract, §1, §2 and §11) | ✓ | A PBFT committee commits five-second blocks with immediate finality. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | – | Pruning is not documented for go-abey. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | – | The go-abey tree contains les/light packages, but nothing shows a working trustless light client on mainnet. |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 3.5 of 10: whitepaper privacy 3.5 of 7, extra features 0 of 3, 1 not yet researched source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | 10 | Any secp256k1 key can hold and send ABEY; the chain's account and transfer rules carry no identity check. |
| UTXO ledger (Separate outputs, change to a new address · Whitepaper §2, §9) | 0 | An account ledger: one running balance for each address, so the remainder stays at the sending address and its payments share one public history. |
| HD addresses (A new address for each payment, unlinked · Whitepaper §10) | – | |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | 0 | EVM balances and transfers are public. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | 0 | Accounts are public; no privacy feature. |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | 0 | go-ethereum-style p2p gossip with no Dandelion relay or built-in Tor. |
| Programmability | 7.8 | 7 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance (At protocol level) | 2 | EVM-compatible chain (go-abey, a go-ethereum fork) on which any account can deploy ERC-20-style token contracts. |
| Smart contracts (General-purpose) | 2 | EVM (go-abey, a go-ethereum-derived client with the Ethereum vm package) on which any account can deploy contracts. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | Multisig and time-lock contracts on its EVM. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | Solidity HTLCs can be deployed on its EVM. |
| Native DEX (Trades the coin itself, not a claim) | ✗ | No DEX found trading the coin itself: none on its own chain (DefiLlama), and not on THORChain, Maya, Chainflip, Komodo DeFi, BasicSwap, Bisq or Haveno (checked 2026-11-04). |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | Interoperability is claimed, but no protocol-verified cross-chain messaging mechanism is documented. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✓ | ERC-721 contracts run by its EVM. |
| Demand | 2.7 | average of 7 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 1 | 1 exchange |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0.1 | $12,857 traded in 24 hours; #2542 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 30, $11,779) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 0 | 0.03% of its market cap a day, median of the last 30 days |
| Order-book depth (±2% of the price ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | 2.6 | $2,330 within 2% of the price on 1 exchange, 0.01% of its market cap, median of the last 15 days |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 3.9 | $38M, 3.9 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | 10 | no futures, options or margin on the exchanges read |
| Wallet support (wallets that hold it, 10 or more: 10) | 1 | its own node and wallet, counted as 1: no wallet in the site's directory lists it yet |
| Record | 4.7 | average of 3 criteria |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 4 | 4 full years since 2021-12-30, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, fixes, vulnerabilities) | 0 | 0 positive, 4 negative source |
| Negative | ||
| Steady work, 0 of 6 | ✗ | 0 commits in 0 of the last 12 months (github.com/abeychain/go-abey); go-abey v3.3.0, released 2023-12-12; last commit on main April 2023; no release in 24 months. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2023-09-06, −1 | ✗ | go-ethereum GHSA-ppjg-v974-84cm (CVE-2023-40591, High) lets a flood of p2p pings spawn unbounded goroutines until the node runs out of memory; go-abey v3.3.0 (geth-1.8-era fork with backports) still answers pings in a new goroutine (fixed in 1.12.1). github.com github.com |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-01-13, −1 | ✗ | go-ethereum GHSA-mr7q-c9w9-wh4h (CVE-2026-22862, High) lets a crafted p2p message crash the node with a too-short ECIES ciphertext; go-abey v3.3.0 (geth-1.8-era fork with backports) lacks the 1.16.8 length check. github.com github.com |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-02-17, −1 | ✗ | go-ethereum GHSA-2gjw-fg97-vg3r (CVE-2026-26314, High) lets a crafted p2p message crash the node through unchecked secp256k1 point coordinates; go-abey v3.3.0 (geth-1.8-era fork with backports) lacks the 1.16.9 coordinate check. github.com github.com github.com |
| Conduct (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
Ten sections, weighted equally, each 0 to 10: consensus (the two ladders), supply (the supply scale and a fixed cap that holds), distribution (premine, fundraising, developer share, holders), decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes), security, scalability, privacy, programmability (what the scripting layer can do beyond the whitepaper's payment system), demand, and record (age, development, conduct). They are built from the criteria in the second table: privacy, scalability, security and decentralisation are the Cryptocurrency Standards among them, as follows: privacy (the whitepaper's three checks a base of 7 of 10, three extra features up to 3 more), scalability (four measures and three features), security (pool diversity, network activity, hashrate, clients and two checks) and decentralisation (governance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them, and supply and demand are two: the supply, scored against 21 million, and demand, the average of seven measures of the market and the wallets. Provisional: parts marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
1,044,724,064 ABEY are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 94.9% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
DefaultGenesisBlock in core/genesis.go allocates 1,000,000,000 ABEY at genesis (990,000,000 to 0xEc1F80E553Bf43229EBA70d254E09DD188D604f2 plus 1,000,000 to each of 10 initial committee addresses); 1.0B / ~1.054B circulating today = ~94.9%. Recipients are not publicly named; the ABEY Foundation (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) controls the project.
Not established: no ICO, presale or investor round found in the repository, press releases or aggregators.
No documented public or private sale was found. ABEY first traded on the ZBX exchange in 2020 at about US$0.61 per the Foundation's 2021 press release, but how the genesis supply reached the market is undocumented.
The reward code (consensus/minerva/consensus.go) pays PoW block and fruit miners and the PoS committee/stakers; no developer or foundation output was found (a developerCoin variable survives only in a commented-out log line). Since the TIP9 upgrade (fast block 8,742,700) only committee (staking) rewards are paid, starting at 119.8368 ABEY per block halving every 25,000,000 blocks.
go-abey is a fork of TrueChain (Minerva PoW 'snail chain' + TBFT committee). The genesis balance address held only ~0.005 ABEY on 2026-10-26, so the 990M has been moved on. After TIP9 the PoW chain earns no reward, so 'PoW oversight' is nominal; consensus is effectively DPoS/BFT.
Sources: github.com · github.com · github.com · newsfilecorp.com · coinmarketcap.com · github.com. Researched 2026-10-26, medium confidence.
No source we can reach publishes a hashrate for Abey.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
Abey is #88 among cryptocurrencies and #524 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 436 places between Abey's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).